Wednesday, April 23, 2025

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund

Today, T. Rowe Price, one of my favored and recommended fund managers, touted their Capital Appreciation Fund, symbol PRWCX, claiming "17 years" of superior performance on LinkedIn.  

An Unprecedented Streak of Performance

So, I just had to check.


SPY in blue
PRWCX in red
20 year normalized performance
Source: Barchart.com

S&P vs. T. Rowe Price Cap. Appr. Fund

Sorry, but I just don't see it. 

More from TRP:

Our Capital Appreciation suite puts a record-breaking team on your side

Our commitment to serving clients drives us to think deeply about their needs and develop powerful solutions to address different investor goals. The Capital Appreciation Fund is just one of several in our Capital Appreciation suite, each designed with different objectives and risk tolerances in mind. While each fund has a unique investment objective, all share a single goal: to deliver better outcomes for clients.

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF)  

  • Seeks capital growth

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) - Currently closed to new investors

  • Seeks capital growth plus preservation

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation & Income Fund (PRCFX)

  • Seeks income plus capital growth

Saturday, April 12, 2025

Vista Commodity Basket up 7% Q1 2025

The Vista Commodity basket of 15 diversified long-dated commodity futures contracts rose 7% in the first quarter of 2025. While April's tariff tantrum tanked stocks and the commodity ETFs, the long-dated Vista basket fared a little better falling only to unchanged for the year. 


Short-term commodity index ETF performance.

Normalized ccrors where 12/29/2023 = 1000
VISTA =  Vista Commodity Basket
SPY = SPDR S&P 500 ETF
DJP = Bloomberg Commodity Index ETF
GSG = S&P GSCI Commodity Index ETF
Source: Barchart.com

Rollng Returns as of 3/31/2025.

The long-term chart shows how the Vista basket recovers to new all-time highs while the major commodity index ETFs have barely broken even for the 16 year period and still have far to go to make their 2010 highs. 

Commodities recover to new long-term highs.

Normalized commodity ETF performance where 4/30/2009, the Vista Basket inception date, = 1000.

2025's commods were propelled by gold's 20% gain in the first quarter. Note, the table below has a 4/12/2025 end date. 

Vista basket component 4/12/25 ytd returns.
Source:Barchart.com

While commodities LOOKED healthy, tariff threats can take a major toll on these and all markets. The world was in an excellent position for outsize returns in nearly all markets. Tariff threats are actually an ex-ante or externality not central to the real economy, at least not YET central. If they become real, all bets are off and the world of unintended consequences rears its ugly head. EVEN IF, all threats are rescinded, the economics may not recover for a long time as the rule of law, confidence and trust in Pax Americana may be broken for four or more years. 


© VistaMktResearch, All Rights Reserved  
gdrahal@VistaMktResearch.com 
















Wednesday, April 9, 2025

AQR versus SPY + BND

After reading a tout piece on the history of AQR as a quant fund I looked it up. AQR (symbol AQRIx) is a 60-40 stock/bond fund for rich people. The minimum individual investment is $5 Million!


SPY = SPDR S&P 500 ETF
AGG = iShares Aggregate Bond ETF
AQTIX = AQR Multi Asset Fund


Look at the YTD%Chg, down only a fraction of the market. AQR is the fund Bernie Madoff wanted to show his investors, nary a down year. But then again, while avoiding risk, you avoid gains as the 2,3,5,and 10 year returns show. 

Then again, why buy AGR when you can make your own 60/40 SPY/BND mix. And this mix triples while AGR doubles? Caveat: it will take work and cost rebalancing you own 60/40 portfolio. So maybe the difference between the green and orange is rebalancing cost.

Sunday, April 6, 2025

The Magic of 3X ETFs

This data in this post is as of 2/10/25.

On January 29, 1982, trading began in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange S&P 500 futures contract (symbol ES). This futures contract was designed primarily for institutional and large speculative investors. (Today there’s the micro e-mini and many other index futures contracts.)

On January 29, 1993, State Street’s S&P 500 SPDR (symbol SPY) became the first index exchange traded fund (ETF) which offered indexers the ease and liquidity of regular stock trading.  And finally, on November 6, 2008, a controversial innovation, the S&P 500 Bull 3X Direxion ETF (symbol SPXL) began trading. SPXL is a “3X fund”, it targets three times the daily return of the S&P 500 index each day. SPXL may have three times the risk, but this is where the magic happens!

To start, let’s compare the 5-year chart for the three liquid index products: SPY (the plain vanilla S&P stock index ETF), ESn (the continuous “nearby” S&P 500 futures contract) and SPXL (the jacked up 3X leveraged S&P 500 ETF):

Continuously compounded performance, normalized where 1/3/2020 = 1000.

 

Table 1









SPY = S&P 500 SPDR

ESn = S&P 500 “E-mini” continuous nearby futures contract

SPXL = S&P 500 Bull 3X Direxion ETF

Continuously compounded annualized return and standard deviation.

Source: barchart.com closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits.

 

First let’s note the chart has 2 major market breaks, one in 2020 and the other in 2022. Also note Table 1 in no way shows SPXL (or any other 3X ETF we look at, for that matter) delivers 3X for extended periods. The one month is close: 8% versus the 9% target. Going further out the SPXL definitely has a higher return than the index but the farther out you go, volatility takes its toll. SPXL’s 1 year 43% is good but far off the 3X 60% target. For the 2, 3 and 5 years, the gap only gets worse. To Direxion’s credit, the SPXL prospectus makes no claims for periods over ONE DAY! Even the 3X daily target has no guarantee. The prospectus does point out the risk that a 33% one day drop in the index is a 100% loss in the 3X.

 

Looking again at the chart, SPY fell roughly 30% in the 2020 market break. At the March 2020 low, SPXL was down 70%!  You COULD claim that SPXL outperformed, beating its -90% target, but this was no comfort as we lived it. The 2022 market break took SPY roughly from up 50% on Jan 1, 2022, to up only 20% by October, a 30% decline.  At the same time, SPXL went from roughly +100% to -20%, a 120% decline-this time exceeding its 3X target!

 

Before leaving returns, let’s point out that SPY and nearly ALL broad-based index ETFs have de minimis tracking error. They are excellent proxies for their underlying indexes. Also note that the index futures contract lags the index generally in all periods. This is due to the cost of maintaining a futures position-rolling futures from the March contract to June, to September and finally the “Christmas” December expiration month and so on.

 

We see the risks, let’s see the magic!

 

To see this, assume you throw caution at the wind and recklessly want to maximize your exposure to the S&P 500 stock index with the least amount of cash possible. The E-Mini S&P 500 futures contract value equals $50 per point ($50 x 3642.25 =) $182,113. The “exchange minimum margin” on January 3, 2020 was $6,300. $6,300 controlled $182K! This is insane 30X leverage! If the E-mini falls 126 points, you are wiped out. But long before that happens, your broker will give you a margin call or sell you out. Or, more likely, will NOT honor exchange minimums and demand a much larger initial deposit.

 

Next, you buy $182,000 SPY on maximum 50% margin, borrowing half of the purchase and paying half in cash or $91,000 . Finally, buy $182,000 worth of SPXL. Since this is 3X, you cannot buy on margin but your $60,000 purchase allegedly controls $180,000.

 

Table 2




  

In Table 2, we see the market price and starting account value for each of our investment comparisons.

 

Table 3.




 



In Table 3 we assume the investor holds their ETFs or rolls their futures and meets ALL margin calls with no withdrawals from the 1/3/2020 start date to the current 2/10/2025 end date. Commissions and interest not included.

 

Here comes the magic! While the returns are all roughly the same, leveraged futures and marginable stock have the risk of margin calls. Your 3X ETF will have NO MARGIN CALLS no matter where the market goes. Due to the hocus-pocus of 3X money managers, 3X can give you a dollar certainty the other choices cannot. You are one and done with 3X. You are one and maybe many margin calls- not done- with the others. In the end, the total dollars for futures and 3X, were not much different (roughly $60K) nor did they affect the returns. But on day one, who knew? While not an endorsement of 3X ETFs, take this as an illustration of the three basic ways to leverage a position.

 

Caveats: these kinds of results can only be expected with the broadest based index products with the lowest tracking errors. The more exotic the underlying or complex the product is, the greater the variation in returns. Why volatility affects total return is for another article.


Friday, March 28, 2025

Does it Matter If You Buy On An Up or Down Day?

SPY Closing Price Since Inception

Looking at SPY since inception, it doesn't seem to matter. If you wait long enough, the SPY rose above all prior highs. But let's look at the numbers:

Low and High Buy Returns
Source: Barchart.com

The above table looked at the average continuously compounded rolling return for every day SPY was open since inception. And then I took the average gain or loss starting from day 1's close to the 1 month close, the 3 month, the 1 Year, etc. etc.. 

In THIS market, for THIS period buying at the high or low does NOT MATTER! Just buy and hold. This is the secret to Bogle's "Stay the Course".The actual data and calcs are available upon request. 














Tuesday, March 25, 2025

VGT VOO and Other ETFs

Here is a wonderful LinkedIn comment to my post recommending the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF VOO:

"Buy and hold the S&P 500 ETF" what foolish advice. Buy and hold VGT instead. VGT massively outperforms SPY and QQQ. Which sector can outpace the tech sector? Put your goddamn hand down that was a trick question."  https://bit.ly/4j52F7C

As they say on the internet: Let's see it:


Normalized performance where VOO 9/10/2010 start date = 1000
Data source: Barchart.com



Above is the VOO VGT normalized chart and YES, VGT, long term, is a great fund with fantastic returns. There's no argument about that but AT WHAT COST? Looking year-to-date, the loss in VTG is more than THREE times the loss of VOO and the 52 week gain is LESS than VOO! Two, three, five year and more gains are HIGHER but so is the RISK!

If you are a sophisticated investor maybe the 23% implied volatility/risk is ok for you but most of us can barely stomach the S&P's market risk with our nest egg. My S&P recommendation was for individual investors, with limited time, capital and no special access to information. So yes, market risk is about as far as I am willing to go.

Also, going for return makes no sense for investors who cannot delay access to funds when markets go bad. If you want return, why NOT buy SOXL with the second highest 10 year return, or go hog wild buying the TQQQ 3X ETF? And why stop there when you can buy the highest returning ETF in history-the bitcoin GBTC? NO, the one day, short-term and long-term risks are too great. 


Monday, March 24, 2025

Thursday, March 13, 2025

Inflation vs Money Supply

Some are claiming the Fed is a failure and Money Supply is the cause of US inflation. Both claims are not backed up by any facts. This is a nice way of saying these claims are lies. And, when made by those who KNOW the facts, they are bad faith ideological bias! Lets see it:

Chart showing Money Supply does not cause inflation.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis data normalized where 2/1/2015 = 1000.

These are records from the St. Louis Fed. 2015 to 2020 had some of the lowest inflation numbers in history! The data clearly show money supply rising 20%-30% or more. In that period, the red inflation line is just slightly elevated. 

THEN 2020 comes and so does the unprecedented COVID pandemic! The pandemic decimates the world supply chain raising prices. Money supply also rises as the Fed provides liquidity to the economy in stress. THEN Putin invades Ukraine, further crushing world supply chains (especially in food). 

Finally the money supply STOPS rising in in 2022! In fact, it falls and has only moderate growth to the present. Prices continue to rise but NOT due to rising money supply.

Money supply is a mirage propagated by Milton Friedman for ideological purposes and is used as a partisan excuse to reduce government benefits to workers and the general public. 

Note: The St. Louis Fed is an authoritative "primary source". Too many secondary sources showing different results are found all over the internet and have modifications, adjustments or fabrications-all to prove their ideological point. 

T





Monday, March 10, 2025

Stocks are FALLING!


Stocks are FALLING!




SPY = S&P 500 SPDR ETF
TQQQ = 3X Nasdaq 100 ETF
Performance normalized where 1/2/2020 =1000
Source: barchart.com


2025 High and Low Closing Price Action

SPY and TQQQ bookends the stock market where SPY ="market" risk and TQQQ = just about the highest risk suitable for rational investors. With SPY down "only" 7% we see WHY you might NOT want to buy and hold TQQQ.

The question remains: how LOW can it go. 





*as of 3/10/2025 10:14 AM EDT

IF history is any guide (BIG IF), the market can go a long way down. 80% down in TQQQ would take us to $19 or so. A 40% break in SPY would take us to $368 or so. All we have is history and our only saving grace here is history also shows the market, with time, recovers. 

Tuesday, February 4, 2025

What Have You Done Lately Department

 We are a month into the new year and here's where we stand:



Ha! GLD - the world's largest gold ETF, driven by fear and chaos in the US government, leads the pack up 8.23% year-to-date. Finally, gold is beating the perennial winner, the bitcoin ETF, GBTC! DJP, the Bloomberg commodity ETF, propelled by precious metals is second on the leaderboard.  Even the leveraged S&P, the 3X SPXL, is beating GBTC, so far. 

GBTC, up 6.87% ytd, doesn't disappoint and is not far behind. Note its fantastic 52 week numbers, up 100+%. With its unique drivers/anonymous demand from money laundering, drug dealing and terrorism, GBTC -the bitcoin of ETFs- will not just outperform but thrive in today's environment of lawless government and the rising Thrift Economy. Such are the fruits of Oligarchy in America.

Again, no surprise. the Nasdaq 3X Leveraged TQQQ is up but not in the same league, lagging its daily target by only basis points. Small caps, ags, energy are all lumped together, with decent plus 3% returns. SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, QQQ the Nasdaq 100 ETF and IWM, the Russell 2000 ETF, collectively are more in line with lower expectations posting 2%+ gains. 

What is a reasonable outlook? If government becomes MORE chaotic and MORE lawless (runaway tariffs, stopped payments, mass layoffs and mass deportations), GLD may continue its fear and loathing and rise to new heights. Likewise GBTC can do the same, although its fundamental demand never stops. Otherwise, say, if the House flips to Dems or the Repubs in Congress put brakes on the White House-gold may come off and the other markets will begin to once again reflect the real exonomy. 

Sunday, February 2, 2025

Vista Basket Up 4.8% in January 2025

The Vista Basket of 15 select long-dated commodity futures contracts closed at  $1,284,823.03 up $60,536.00 or 4.8% beating the major commodity index ETFs, DBC up 2.7%, DJP up 4.7% and GSG up 3.5% for the month. The total short-term (since 12/31/2023) and long-term performance (since Vista's 4/30/2009 inception) is shown below:

Vista compared to commodity ETFs for short-term.


Vista compared to commodity ETF long-term.

VISTA = Vista Commodity Basket
DBC = DB Commodity Index Fund Invesco
DJP = Ipath Commodity Index TR ETN
GSG = S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Ishares ETF
Continuously compounded performance normalized where 4/30/2009 = 1000.
Source for dividend adjusted closing prices: barchart.com

table of ccror rolling returns
Continuously compounded annualized returns.

Again, the conservative, largely dormant Vista Basket beats on all periods the headline commodity index ETFs that continually roll and re-roll their neaby contracts over and over within each year. The wisdom of one unavoidable roll per year plus Vista's superior selection criteria work to insure a fairer, lower volatility and more representative index. 

One may ask: Why show the ETFs? Why not show the actual index returns? The short answer is investors cannot own an index, only the ETFs (or other derivatives). Or one can try to replicate the indexes themselves-an onerous process, at best.  So the only way to fairly compare an investable basket is to other investable instruments-in this case, the ETFs. Note also, these are the largest, most liquid and seasoned ETFs in the commodity universe. 





Monday, January 13, 2025

Vista Basket Up 16% in 2024!

This post has NO AI.

Beating both "headline" S&P GSCI (+3.7%) and Bloomberg (0.1%) commodity index ETFs, the Vista Basket closed at  $1,222,577.03 up  $183,831.65 on 12/31/2024 up 16% for the year. 

Year to date normalized closing prices.

Commodity Index Performance Normalized where 12/31/2023 = 1000
Vista = Vista Commodity Basket
DJP = Ipath Commodity Index TR ETN (Bloomberg Commodity Index)
GSG = S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Ishares ETF
Source of split and dividend adjusted closing prices: Barchart.com

Major Commodity ETFs


The Vista Basket is a composed of 15 diversified, fair, long-dated, well-formed, lower volatility commodity futures contracts. DJP is diversified while GSG is a heavily weighted (almost 70%) energy. Both DJP and GSG track the Bloomberg Commodity Index  and S&P GSCI Excess Return Index, respectively, very closely. Both significantly lag Vista in the long and short-term. The fantastic gains in cocoa, coffee and other softs account for Vista's outperformance. USCI is a boutique commodity index based on forward curve shape, i.e. commodities displaying the greatest contango. This has shown superior returns over that last 10 years. 

Vista Commodity Basket Component Returns


Downloaded from Barchart.com 1/12/2025

Contact me at gdrahal@outlook.com for more information.

















 


Friday, January 3, 2025

Bitcoin and GBTC

Bitcoin has the highest historic returns EVER in ANY market. It even eclipses the gains of AAPL, Google and Microsoft. Where does this price appreciation come from? Also, we see widespread adoption of bitcoin by major financial institutions in multiple forms (ETFs, swaps, futures). Does this mean we should invest in Bitcoin and its derivatives?

Below is a chart and table of GBTC and SPY, the largest bitcoin and S&P 500 ETFs since the inception of GBTC in 2015:

Cont. compounded normalized returns.

Continuously compounded normalized returns.


Continuously compounded annualized rolling returns as of 12/31/2024.
GBTC = Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (Bitcoin)
SPY = S&P 500 SPDR (Stocks)

SPY barely shows up on the chart. GBTC is the world’s oldest and largest (last I looked) bitcoin ETF. There is a slew of new crypto ETFs. While the above returns are out of this world, so are the risks! And standard deviation 5 times greater than SPY does not capture it. There are enormous one day losses GBTC can experience. Below is a scatter plot of daily price changes for GBTC and SPY.

Scatter plot of daily percentage price returns for GBTC and SPY.

It may be hard to see but one-day 10% moves up or down are much greater for GBTC than SPY (84 days vs. 5 days). The worst day ever for GBTC was down 49% versus down 11% for SPY.

By definition, since nothing underlies crypto, it is a pure gamble. 

Further, bitcoin and almost ALL crypto exist in a digital anonymous blockchain. Anonymity or “trustless value” is its major calling card and there’s the rub. Bitcoin deliberately has no “know your customer” (KYC). 

KYC is the basis of modern finance and every financial institution including every casino (except bitcoin). KYC is a fundamental tenant of AML or anti-money laundering. With no KYC, bitcoin has unprecedented availability to and demand from money laundering, drug dealing and terrorism. This accounts for its fantastic rise in the marketplace. Many have called for outlawing bitcoin. Unlike legal porn (another source of outrageous return) which is shamed out of commerce, bitcoin has no shame, so far. 

Ok, so if you own it, know WHAT you own!

Note while bitcoin derivatives HAVE KYC, the underlying still doesn’t. The wrappers don’t help. And while there is much work on decoding the blockchain (kind of like decoding DNA) this will be slow to end crypto’s anonymity and source of enormous demand. 

Monday, October 21, 2024

The Fundamental Theorem of Investing

-NO AI is used in writing this post!-

While I don't have the proof I believe there IS a proof of, what I call: 


The Fundamental Theorem of Investing


Given any market that is 1-attributable, 2-non-opaque, 3-open, 4-free, 5-well formed, 6-where all participants are price takers, and 7-has positive skew (a long term history of rising prices); then, 


A broad based index will outperform active management. 


The proof, if it exists, may be something like this:


The broad based index is always long.

Any active manager must not always be long.

Any active manager must at times be flat or short. 

Any active manager has costs and friction that long only investors do not.

Every flat position has zero return but can avoid long only losses.

Every short position has positive and negative return.

In axiom 7, a positive skew market, the weighted sum of upticks is greater than the sum of downticks.

Therefore, active managers can only beat the index if the sum of avoided downticks + "short downticks" is greater than all the ticks in the market-this may be a contradiction. Therefore the theorem holds. Ok, ok, as I said, this may not be a proof.


In other words, is the return of the flats and shorts enough to avoid the losses of long only and end up beating the long only return? It may be concievable but there is no "public" "audited" "freely available" evidence for this. Is there a fund, in history, that has done this? This is the unlikely prospect facing all active managers. 


And "average" investors, with limited time, capital and no special access to information can easily WIN 70-90% of the time by just buying and holding the largest, lowest cost and most liquid investment in the world. 


Caveat: a stock picker, anytime, can always hit the jackpot and beat the market but does it last? It's kind of like gambling as any long-term holder of Penn Central, Western Union, GE, US Steel, Ford, GM, IBM, Yahoo, AOL, Cisco and Intel (among many others) can tell you. 


One last but major point: Indexing, as beneficial to investors as it may be, if it becomes the dominant investment theme in the market, will end up as a major systemic threat to the entire financial system. The system is based on the concept of rationing, of separating winners from losers and winnowing losers from the market. If too many investors never sell, well, we lose the system that picks winners from losers and that, if it ever happens, is a threat to the system.


Tuesday, October 15, 2024

Active vs Passive

S&P Global has just issued their 2024 first half SPIVA Scorecard which measures how many actively managed funds outperformed the S&P 500 across standard rolling time periods. Here are the results: 

Percentage of All Large-Cap funds that underperformed the S&P 500®

SPY returns and Active Performance

SPY = SPDR S&P 500 ETF continuously compounded annualized return.
Closing Price Source: Microsoft Stockhistory function 
%Under = Percent of Active Funds Underperforming the S&P 500 

For the year ending 6/30/2024, 76% of ALL comparable actively managed funds, as defined by S&P, could NOT BEAT the S&P 500 index! Looking at the 3, 5 and 10 year periods, it becomes ridiculous with 80% of all active managers underperforming. The year-end 2023 results, were slightly better for the one year period (60% vs 76%) but the longer term results were just as bad for active managers.

I added the annualized returns for the SPY ETF (the largest S&P 500 ETF) to highlight that market returns have no little or no effect on active manager performance. Neither up nor down markets appear to give active managers the advantage. In fact, down markets could be expected to show where active managers shine-they can sell or go short and avoid or capitalize on losses where indexers must take the hits and survive the drawdowns. Results show that their outperformance, if any, is fleeting. There is NO persistence of top ranked active managers from one period to the next. See the SPIVA Persistence Scorecard ( https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/spiva/article/us-persistence-scorecard/ ) if you have any doubts about this. 

The SPIVA scorecard has been published for almost 20 years and I do not have this data. You can actually find some historical SPIVA data (2002 to 2017) at Bogleheads websites with links to Google Sheets here: https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/SPIVA_scorecards and here: https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Talk:SPIVA_scorecards .

Suffice it to say that for as long as it has been published, active managers cannot beat the S&P! What does this say for the trillions in active assets? What does this say for individual investors facing a barage of ads and promotions to buy into the next big thing or star fund manager? Is active management just a grift?

Blackstone, Fidelity and Merrill Lynch beg to differ but they do not have the performance to back their claims. One could arguably make the case that If these investment firms and IF the world's largest and richest fund managers cannot beat the passive S&P, then NOBODY can! Futhermore if nobody can consistently and reliably beat the passive index, WHY WOULD ANYBODY invest in anything else?

There may be a reason, and its the same reason we have casinos, bookies and horse races...it's that there's a chance. There's a chance you could pick a winner and a big life changing winner. There's a chance you could be an original investor in Penn Central, US Steel, GE, IBM, Walmart, Apple Computer, Microsoft, AOL, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Tesla or bitcoin, even. 

Chance belongs to those with risk capital. Serious capital, large or small, may gain from investment with historically exceptional returns. 





Tuesday, October 1, 2024

Vista Basket Up 14.2% Year-to-date

 Vista continues its rise and outperformance through the third quarter.

Vista basket beats BCOM and GSCI

Normalized monthly performance since Vista inception, 4/30/2009  = 1000
Vista = Vista Commodity Basket
BCOM ER = Bloomberg Commodity Excess Return Index
GSCI ER = S&P GSCI Commodity Excess Return Index
Sources of closing prices: barchart.com, bloomberg.com,spglobal.com 

Continuously compounded rolling returns

Continuously compounded returns for rolling perionds as of 9/30/2024.

For almost ANY period and not just the ones shown above, the long-dated, diversified Vista basket has outperformed both the diversified frequently rolled Bloomberg index and the energy weighted frequently rolled GSCI index. Vista is helped by the rise in precious metals. The GSCI has been weighted down by the decline in energy futures whereas Bloomberg is also seeing the effects of a general revaluation of ags, energies and commodities in general. YES, inflaition IS coming down. 

WHY "Excess Return" indexes? Because excess return indexes do not incude any collateral interest and neither does the Vista basket. Vista makes no assumptions about how you finance your commodity positions, Vista assumes that your commodity account is fully collateralized with cash. The Vista basket only includes commodity futures contract returns. Thus, the excess return indexes are comparable measures.** 

Why does Vista beat the major commodity indexes? Three reasons: Vista includes the right names, the right months and the right rolls. 

Right names-The Vista basket only includes major price discovery commodities. While commercial accounts can affect market prices, all participants are price takers in Vista names. Even Saudis cannot control oil prices. Markets where participants have price power are not free markets and are avoided by Vista. This selection is a proprietary art of Vista.

Right months-trading is the friction/the enemy of market returns. Too much trading, including frequent rolls, reduce investor returns. But futures have expiration dates so rolls are a necessary evil. Vista carries the longest dated months with suitable liquidity. This is a proprietary art of Vista.

Right rolls: when to roll and when to hold long-dated futures contracts is another determinant of investor return and another proprietary art of Vista.

All of the above above plus holding only well-formed markets and other minor factors all contribute to Vista's significant 300 to 2000 basis point outperformance versus the headline commodity indexes. 

What is the Vista Commodity Basket? The Vista Basket is a futures account that buys and holds 15 commodity futures contracts. As of September 30, 2024 the Vista Basket is composed of the following:

Vista commodity basket notional values

Note that the Vista Commodity Basket, when held by investors, was valued at $1.22MM on 12/30/24. Since this account is fully colleteralized, i.e. margined at 100%, the full $1.22 MM is posted on the account. Actual quantity and contract size is proprietary and an art of Vista. 

**Note that fully collateralized/100% collateral positions will never have margin calls (assuming prices do not go negative). Further, since the excess returns and the Vista basket ARE fully collateralized, the investor return will always be higher than the excess return since cash WILL be invested in TBills. Ine key feature of excess returns is the lack of forced liquidations due to margin calls.